A Smarter Alternative to the Aggregator Model

Most global employment “platforms” are intermediaries; they don’t own the entities they use to hire your employees, they resell them. That means slower execution, opaque pricing, and compliance decisions made by a partner you’ve never spoken to. KOMP is built differently. We own our infrastructure. You feel the difference on day one.

Why The Model Matters

Most Platforms are Middlemen. KOMP is the Platform

When an aggregator-model EOR provider hires an employee in Germany on your behalf, there’s a chain: you → the platform → a local partner entity → your employee. Communication is layered. Fees are marked up at every step. If the local partner has a compliance issue, it becomes your problem.
KOMP owns its entities directly in 100+ countries. When you hire through KOMP, there are two parties: you and KOMP.

Aggregator Model

What You’re Actually Getting:

Delayed execution from layered communication between you, the platform, and the local partner

Hidden fees embedded in FX conversions, local partner markups, and processing charges

Shared compliance risk: the platform’s partner made the decision, but it’s your employee

The KOMP Direct Model

What You Actually
Get:

Sub-100ms processing on owned infrastructure with no intermediary delays

Flat, transparent fee structure- zero hidden FX markups, no surprises on invoice

Full legal liability ownership- KOMP is the employer of record, not a pass-through

Detailed Feature Matrix

See Exactly What Sets KOMP Apart

Feature

KOMP Recommended

Others

Owned Entity Infrastructure (100+ countries)

✓ Yes — Direct

× Limited / Partner-Dependent

Real-Time Gross-to-Net Payroll

✓ Yes

× No

Automated Contract Generation

✓ Yes — Instant

× Manual Drafting

IP Protection (local law)

✓ Yes — Strongest

? Varies by Partner

Transparent FX Pricing (0% markup)

✓ Yes

× Hidden Markups

Audit-Ready Documentation

✓ Yes — Real-Time

? Varies

24/7 Human HR Support

✓ Yes — Dedicated

× Inconsistent

Free HRIS Included

✓ Yes — Included

× Add-On Cost

Equipment Provisioning

✓ Yes

× Not Available

Head-To-Head Comparisons

Choose Your Comparison

Every Session Matters

Therapists support clients in making small steps for improvements.

KOMP vs. Deel

Deel excels at fast contractor onboarding for startups, and its brand recognition is well-earned for simple use cases. But as your compliance complexity grows, particularly across contractor classification, enterprise customization, and FX pricing, the gaps widen.

Zero hidden FX fees vs. Deel’s embedded exchange rate markups

Owned entity infrastructure vs. Deel’s partner-dependent EOR in several markets

Enterprise-grade customization for contracts, payroll cycles, and access controls.

Dedicated compliance support vs. standardized responses

Best for you if: Your team is scaling beyond the startup stage and needs compliance depth, cost transparency, and enterprise-grade infrastructure.

KOMP vs. Remote

Remote is a direct-model competitor and a genuinely credible platform. The key differentiators are cost, flexibility, and the breadth of the platform.

More competitive per-employee pricing, particularly at scale

More flexible payroll cycle options (bi-weekly, custom)

Free HRIS included vs. Remote’s add-on pricing structure

Equipment provisioning as a native capability, not a third-party integration

Best for you if: You’ve evaluated Remote and want equivalent infrastructure at a lower total cost with more flexibility.

KOMP vs. Rippling

Rippling is excellent for US-centric IT and HR management. For international expansion, however, Rippling relies on an aggregator model for EOR in many markets, introducing the same partner-dependency risks.

Owned entity infrastructure globally vs. Rippling’s partner-dependent EOR

Built-first for global employment vs. Rippling’s US-first architecture

Simpler, more transparent pricing for international hires

Faster EOR onboarding in complex markets

Best for you if: You’re a global-first business that needs deep international employment infrastructure, not US IT management with global bolt-ons.

KOMP vs. Velocity Global

Velocity Global is a legacy player in the EOR space. But its manual, services-heavy model creates slower turnaround times and a complex pricing structure that requires a sales call to decode.

Technology-first platform vs. Velocity’s services-heavy, manual approach

Transparent, flat-fee pricing vs. Velocity’s complex, opaque tiers

Faster onboarding timelines across all markets

Modern self-serve and API capabilities for teams that want them

Best for you if: You’ve been using Velocity Global and are ready for an infrastructure upgrade.

Three Things We Don’t Compromise On

Transparency

Every transaction, entity status, and compliance record is visible in real time. No black boxes. No surprises on the invoice. Full audit trails for every action, accessible by the right people at the right time.

Expertise

KOMP was built by people who spent years inside global employment operations, compliance, and HR infrastructure. The platform reflects that experience, not a generalist interpretation of what global employment should look like.

Accountability

When KOMP is your EOR, KOMP owns the legal responsibility. We’re not passing it to a local partner and hoping for the best. We stand behind every hire, every contract, and every compliance decision.

Ready To Hire Your Next Global Employee The Right Way?

Get a custom cost analysis and compliance roadmap for your target market.

Speak with an Expansion Expert

Monthly claims volume 7,700

500 20,000

Average claim value $350

$200 $1,200

Fee rate 7%

3% 10%

Claims denied / month

847

Revenue in unworked denials

$118,650

Your fees lost / month

$8,306

Recoverable with XYRO / year

$69,766

Based on 11% denial rate, 40% unworked, 70% recovery rate with XYRO.
Results will vary.

Denial queue, March 2026

All payers AI priority

Open denials

147

23 expiring this week

Recovered this month

$48,230

71% recovery rate

AI actions today

61

Recommendations generated

At risk, 7 days

$12,100

Filing deadline approaching

PRIORITY CLAIMS | AI SORTED

CLM-4821 Denied CO-97, missing modifier, 2 hrs ago

AI: Resubmit mod 25 →

XYROAI

Analysis: CLM-4821

CO-97 indicates missing Modifier 25. Based on 47 similar Aetna claims, adding it has an 84% recovery rate. Timely filing window closes in 12 days.

CLM-4803 Recovered CO-4, AI rec followed, resubmitted

+$1,240

CLM-4798 Expiring Unworked, deadline in 4 days

AI: File appeal now →

Most Platforms are Middlemen. KOMP is the Platform

What You’re Actually Getting:

What You Actually Get:

See Exactly What Sets KOMP Apart

Owned Entity Infrastructure (100+ countries)

Real-Time Gross-to-Net Payroll

Automated Contract Generation

IP Protection (local law)

Transparent FX Pricing (0% markup)

Audit-Ready Documentation

24/7 Human HR Support

Free HRIS Included

Equipment Provisioning

Choose Your Comparison

Every Session Matters

KOMP vs. Deel

KOMP vs. Remote

KOMP vs. Rippling

KOMP vs. Velocity Global

Three Things We Don’t Compromise On

Transparency

Expertise

Accountability

Ready To Hire Your Next Global Employee The Right Way?

847

$118,650

$8,306

$69,766

Denial queue, March 2026

147

$48,230

61

$12,100

What You Actually
Get: